{"id":213,"date":"2014-06-03T09:14:10","date_gmt":"2014-06-03T09:14:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/johnfrederickallen.wordpress.com\/?p=213"},"modified":"2014-09-22T19:11:13","modified_gmt":"2014-09-22T18:11:13","slug":"the-damaging-bureaucracy-of-academic-peer-preview-telegraph","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jfallen.org\/wordpress\/2014\/06\/03\/the-damaging-bureaucracy-of-academic-peer-preview-telegraph\/","title":{"rendered":"The damaging bureaucracy of academic peer preview \u2013 Telegraph"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Source: http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/comment\/letters\/10870609\/The-damaging-bureaucracy-of-academic-peer-preview.html<\/p>\n<div class=\"storyHead\">\n<h1>The damaging bureaucracy of academic peer preview<\/h1>\n<h2>Academic funding agencies should support research in unfashionable fields<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"oneHalf gutter\">\n<div class=\"story\">\n<div class=\"cl\">\u00a010:35PM BST 02 Jun 2014<\/div>\n<div class=\"cl\">\u00a0<\/div>\n<div class=\"cl\">SIR \u2013 Under current policies, academic researchers must submit their proposals to a small group of their closest competitors \u2013 their peers \u2013 for consideration before they might be funded. Peers selected by funding agencies are usually allowed to deliver their verdicts anonymously. They assess the proposal\u2019s suitability for funding, whether it would be the best possible use of the resources requested, and determine, if it were successful, the probability that it might contribute to the national economy in some way. If the answers are satisfactory the proposal has roughly a 25 per cent chance of being funded.<\/div>\n<div class=\"cl\">\n<div class=\"secondPar\">\n<p>Peer preview is now virtually unavoidable and its bureaucratic, protracted procedures are repeated for every change in direction or new phase of experimentation or for whatever an applicant might subsequently propose. Consequently, support for research that might lead to major new scientific discoveries is virtually forbidden nowadays, and science is in serious danger of stagnating. Many scientists privately deplore these policies but their professional standing often depends on their acquiescence \u2013 a catch-22 that effectively diminishes public opposition to the policies. We call upon funding agencies to support sustained, open-ended research in unfashionable fields.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"thirdPar\">\n<p><strong>Donald W Braben<\/strong><br \/>University College London<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fourthPar\">\n<p><strong>John F Allen<\/strong><br \/>Queen Mary, University of London<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fifthPar\">\n<p><strong>William Amos<\/strong><br \/>University of Cambridge<\/p>\n<p><strong>Richard Ball<\/strong><br \/>University of Edinburgh<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tim Birkhead<\/strong><br \/>FRS, University of Sheffield<\/p>\n<p><strong>Peter Cameron<\/strong><br \/>Queen Mary, University of London<\/p>\n<p><strong>Richard Cogdell FRS<\/strong><br \/>University of Glasgow;<\/p>\n<p><strong>David Colquhoun FRS<\/strong><br \/>University College London;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Rod Dowler<\/strong><br \/>Industry Forum, London<\/p>\n<p><strong>Irene Engle<\/strong><br \/>United States Naval Academy, Annapolis;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Felipe Fern\u00e1ndez-Armesto<\/strong><br \/>University of Notre Dame<\/p>\n<p><strong>Desmond Fitzgerald<\/strong><br \/>Materia Medica<\/p>\n<p><strong>John Hall<\/strong><br \/>University of Colorado, Nobel Laureate<\/p>\n<p><strong>Pat Heslop-Harrison<\/strong><br \/>University of Leicester<\/p>\n<p><strong>Dudley Herschbach<\/strong><br \/>Harvard University, Nobel Laureate<\/p>\n<p><strong>H Jeff Kimble<\/strong><br \/>Caltech, US National Academy of Sciences<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sir Harry Kroto FRS<\/strong><br \/>Florida State University, Nobel Laureate<\/p>\n<p><strong>James Ladyman<\/strong><br \/>University of Bristol<\/p>\n<p><strong>Peter Lawrence FRS<\/strong><br \/>University of Cambridge<\/p>\n<p><strong>Angus MacIntyre FRS<\/strong><br \/>Queen Mary, University of London<\/p>\n<p><strong>John Mattick FAA<\/strong><br \/>Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney<\/p>\n<p><strong>Beatrice Pelloni<\/strong><br \/>University of Reading<\/p>\n<p><strong>Douglas Randall<\/strong><br \/>University of Missouri<\/p>\n<p><strong>David Ray<\/strong><br \/>Bio Astral Limited<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sir Richard J Roberts FRS<\/strong><br \/>New England Biolabs, Nobel Laureate<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ken Seddon<\/strong><br \/>Queen\u2019s University of Belfast<\/p>\n<p><strong>Colin Self<\/strong><br \/>University of Newcastle<\/p>\n<p><strong>Harry Swinney<\/strong><br \/>University of Texas, US National Academy of Sciences;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Claudio Vita-Finzi FBA<\/strong><br \/>Natural History Museum<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source: http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/comment\/letters\/10870609\/The-damaging-bureaucracy-of-academic-peer-preview.html The damaging bureaucracy of academic peer preview Academic funding agencies should support research in unfashionable fields \u00a010:35PM BST 02 Jun 2014 \u00a0 SIR \u2013 Under current policies, academic researchers must submit their proposals to a small group of their closest competitors \u2013 their peers \u2013 for consideration before they might be funded. Peers &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jfallen.org\/wordpress\/2014\/06\/03\/the-damaging-bureaucracy-of-academic-peer-preview-telegraph\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The damaging bureaucracy of academic peer preview \u2013 Telegraph<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-213","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-about-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jfallen.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jfallen.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jfallen.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jfallen.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jfallen.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.jfallen.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":437,"href":"https:\/\/www.jfallen.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213\/revisions\/437"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jfallen.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jfallen.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jfallen.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}